Prepared Society Forum banner
41 - 60 of 179 Posts

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #41 · (Edited)
Seen online in a news story today about the Russian Rubble increasing interest rates to 20% to protect the Rubble. In the past in North America. We had similar interest rates happen. In hindsight it was said by many investors that they wish they had loaned out money to the government for US treasuries or Canadian Saving bonds or whatever. Locked in interest rates for like 20 to 30 years. So even when the crisis is over and interest rates drop down to lets say 3 to 5 percent again you still kept on getting a 18 percent return on your investment. At 20% you get all your money back every 5 years. Usually there is also tax benefits. At least in your home nation.

Everybody knows, implicitly, that you can trust US treasuries, to be payed back in full with interest, and Canadian Saving Bonds. I trust them. Not sure if I would trust Putin, and whatever Russia has, to not just take the money and run, at some convenient date in the future. Never even looked into it. There past that way. That's a serious problem. People not being able to trust you, at your word and in legal contracts. Interested to see what happens. Economically speaking, in this one thing. Something to watch for in the future.

 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #42 · (Edited)
So it looks like Russia is starting to take out any means of transportation that resistance fighters can use to move around or have small arms and ammo moved around. So group of civilian vehicles especially are getting targeted. So dangerous to be at or around, clusters of vehicles. Any at all. Staging areas for enemy forces to, I would guess. Better learn fast. Groups of men for sure, will also become targets. I suspect.

Also hollow spots in land, I suspect will be targets. Looks like there missiles, almost come straight down. Eventually underground locations where fighter can hide, will be targeted to, I suspect. Like with what Israel did to the Hamas fairly recently. Make them feel safe and let them bunch up, group up together, and then bang with 500 pound iron bombs or whatever the Russians call them. That is not a 500 pound iron bomb being used there or the camera person would be dead too. Some missiles are not detonating. Looks like Russia is using up it's old stock piles.

 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #43 · (Edited)
Well I talked about before, what was done to the former President of the U.S.A. Donald Trump. Live on International TV for all to see and online too. Basically 10s of 1000s of personal attacks constantly. Trying on purpose, some anyway, to literally drive him nuts. I hope the same thing, is not being done to the head of Russia. Putin.

That's a extremely dangerous thing to do with someone, who just mobilized a army and a large one at that. Even if it ends up with being, large scale WW2 style traditional warfare. That's still horrific for millions or more people, in various ways. Like terror for example. I hope that is not just starting. It looks like what was done to Donald Trump, and done if front of the entire world, by the press, and others, mattered. God works in mysterious ways sometimes. Maybe that was never a real though out plan with Putin, but the same results none the less.

Driving Putin, more and more nuts. This is not the same old same old. Things are different already. It's only just started this phase, step. Consequences.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #45 ·
A good example with these (JIT) just in time, logistics systems (no local storage for months or years, of parts even). If war breaks out between Russia and NATO, all deliveries are gone basically as show. 6:48 Into video. If China invades Taiwan, all parts and such, like hard drives, are gone from there to. Some gaming video cards to I think.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #46 · (Edited)
Some of the people fleeing Ukraine are actually Russia spies and saboteurs. A person can do a lot with a lighter. If Canada and other NATO countries had some inkling of a Russian invasion as the USA announced for example. It could explain why, the war measures act (renames and changed a little, the emergency powers act) was enacted, at the time of the trucker protests, in Canada. To get national transportation, operating more smoothly again. Just being honest. For that reason. It is probably, not a good idea right now, to have large scale trucker protests, in the U.S.A. either right now. Make your displeasure's, known though still. Talk about it.

Many spies and such have been placed years ago. Some whom are not spies and such will not be happy if things turn bad, for mother Russia. More eyes watching and caring, is better. Don't want it to be a spie movie, where it's all, action packed, to the last moment, with spy hunters and such, saving the day, at the last moment. What about China?

Might be a good time, wherever you are, to have a bug out bag. Especially with legal documentation. Power of attorney, in event, of your death, brain damage, etc. A will, and spare fuel, water, food, clothing, and guns to, already positioned. Spare fuel to get you wherever you plan to go. Already stored with you. Available to you. Also means all is available for maybe family friends, relatives to have, if needed. At secondary fall back location. And then hopefully to, you have somewhere to go. Even if it's a tent on family property somewhere else. Access to showers, bathroom, etc. Like with family somewhere. At least ask. Work both ways. Medical supplies. Warm clothing. Soap. Also a portable radio. A external antenna can make reception much better. The higher the better. First aid kit. Maybe some basic tools. Spare tire. Insurance. If more than one vehicle, than make sure everybody knows where you are going, to meet up, and a way to tell, if you were there. All written down. Assume people will be lost. Extreme stress situation, and were is the next place you will be. Expected leave times. Tourniquets, pressure bandages, and triangle bandages, might be good to have. If it makes you feel safer. Get official training. If you can. Something is better than nothing. A tie, can be used, as a tourniquet, and sling, and bandage somewhat. Long tie is better that ways.

Messages. Cell phone text messages are like email. They are stored if they are not received for 3 days. Tries every once in a while to sent it to you again. Millions a minutes can be sent. Only 100s of voice phone calls per a cell phone tower are possible at one time. In the past anyway. Need your cell phone on and outside a RF protective case to receive cell phone messages.

Having a lighter being used, is better, than coming after nuclear power plants, which Russian has shown, they are willing to shell. AKA attack. Right in there own back yard. So how about your back yard and country?

Plane with Russian nationals en route to High Arctic grounded in Yellowknife. Northern Canada is a known place with Radioactive ores. Lots of mines here. Lots of mineral wealth. Probably considered somewhat a key resource place during large scale warfare. Want to have or destroy. Same with iron ore mines (steel). The trans Labrador highway. If a invading force landed in Goose Bay, Labrador. It would be consider afterwards (the million man highway of death) to retake. Or maybe the 2 million man highway of death. Flip a coin.

Apparently there are Russian forces in the Arctic to. Whatever that means. Putin might just be wondering what happens. You see. This means, if they are spys, that they are willing, to get caught, for nothing. Over nothing. Maybe. If it is like the mob runs Russia. Well criminals and such think in like ways. Same with lots of government workers. Like mobsters. Sometimes I wonder, whom taught whom stuff. The things I have talked about here, on this web site, are good examples of that.

 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #48 · (Edited)
By Russians attacking a nuclear power plant. Putin is making a very clear statement about what he considers acceptable casualties maybe. Who wants to find out. Also he has people willing to do such things. Even though it appeared to be done very carefully. It is being downplayed. If that had been done anywhere in Canada or the U.S.A. The entire resources, of both countries, would have been mobilized to catch that person, or persons. In both nations entirety, and utter completeness. (A serious attack, especially if it succeeded). Very public things, would be done to that person, or persons.

That is how serious that is. This is not the same old same old. I suspect Putin is sending a clear message. This never happens again N.A.T.O. Ever. And try me. In very careful ways, at first anyway. That could happen, for various reasons. Like to many people are dead, for that to ever happen again. Europe is paying close attention. I promise you that.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #49 · (Edited)
If Russia merely wanted to cut power off from that shelled nuclear power plant in Ukraine. There are safer and simpler ways of doing that. Like blowing up a few high voltage power line towers. Like they did with that TV stations tower. We need to know more than (radiation levels are normal). What equipment has been damaged or destroyed. Etc. What does it mean? What happens if this or that is damaged and or destroyed? In general terms away if possible. Might be too much of a security risk, to talk about to much. Are nuclear technicians still there? Are experienced workers with that plant still there? This is said to be a newer nuclear power plant with better safeties. What are they? Generalities? What catches a fire in a nuclear power plant? Normal fire? How about next week?

Russian forces attack Europe’s largest nuclear power plant in Ukraine l GMA
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #50 · (Edited)
So these reporters were headed in the wrong direction. East it sounds like. Seems all forms of civilian transportation are going to be taken out. Reporters are going to be shot at again I suspect. Reporters are going to have to hoof it to. In certain locations. Maybe. Said there was a small explosion. Maybe toe popper style land mines was used against transport. A smoke grenade is not really a danger or threat, if you are going to run away. Blaze orange or something. Might get some killed. Maybe just very accurate harassing fire done to press. Not actually trying to kill them right now. But appears to be trying to kill them. Which is still really scary. Not just having someone point a gun at you but having a bunch of people shoot at you. Well looks to the shooters, as a bunch of guys with armour on, in a vehicle. Headed east.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #51 · (Edited)
Well I just watched a interesting video on YouTube today. Can't find it right now. It showed a picture of N.A.T.O. joining with various former Warsaw pact countries after the breakup of the U.S.S.R. I have the benefit of hind-site. None of this stuff is easy. I for one would never have even offered Ukraine to join N.A.T.O. Probably the same with other Warsaw pack countries to. Instead I would have wanted to establish a economic alliance only. Kind of like the E.U. But less so. Much less so. Start small. Well debt forgiveness and such to. Meaningful things to the average person right away.

Especially since many people in former Warsaw pack countries greatly care about there current standard of living. Literally just business contracts between us. We buy some of what they got and they buy some of what we got. I would have called it (the 100 year peace plan). Just wait and see plan. 100 years of peace. At least in regards to WW2 style warfare. There was anyway lots of corruption in these various countries. Just like our own to. It simple would take time, for things to get economically better, for some, of the average people anyway. It would be hard, but not impossible to argue, that more money in your back pocket, is a danger to you and us (that country). Start small and grow wealth generation. It's 100 years after all. Well maybe defensive air power. Jet fighters for example can not land and occupy land. Like infantry can. I know nothing really.

In that video. Well I like to think in terms like 99% and 1%. That last 1% can be a killer to get. Well it looked like N.A.T.O. achieved a 99% goal reach in Europe. That was a staggering victor for peace, if nothing else. If it had stopped there. Politicians are not supposed to be just military men. Of military mindset. Or turn our military leaders (the dogs of war) loose. Do what they want. Trained to want to fight the enemy, and destroy the enemy. And have floated to the top in that environment. That is there job and specialization and mindset as needed to be.

Politicians are supposed to have to worry about being un-elected or not getting elected and such. Worry about (we the people) ultimately and our ultimate safety. (No nuclear war). As a lay person, that is how I think of politicians, because of that movie I seen about the (Cuban missile crisis) as a young man. Just a movie but it showed supposedly, the thinking processes, of various Kennedy family members, in the white house. So to me politicians are always ultimately, supposed to base decisions, serious decisions, on weather this will make a eventual nuclear conflict more likely or less likely. Or as good as. Destroying your economy, is not so good either.

In this movie, if I remember correctly. The president, was lied to, by US general I think, during the Vietnam war (nuclear war wanter). Just a movie. Don't know if that is a true statement in real life. In the movie the actor said that everything he was doing was like a chess board basically and we was communicating with the U.S.S.R. basically, by what he did.

When a military achieves staggering victories with peace treaties and such and the government to. They just might want to back off, and pat themselves on the back, for a job well done. That would have literally maybe be consider, the understate of this century. No more of this (total military dominance strategies) against fellow superpowers. Out, standard of living them. Out, human rights laws and enforcement of them. Out, just law them. The military, is just a tool in the toolbox. There are more tools.

Easy to say this in hind-sight. We have people outside the military whom want war for profit or whatever to. Hate. Nuts. Perceived weakness or perceived venerability. Maybe because that's what the Russian bear does when it grows strong? Russia going beyond Ukraine is a key indicator that well, that is what a strong Russian bear does. In in itself anyway. Assuming it is not attacked by N.A.T.O. forces. Things should be clear then mostly. Clear enough. Whatever reason is given. Even years from now.

When people would have heard of the 100 years of peace plan. They would have known there was a real chance. They would have wanted it to be real. People would have had to do things, for peace not to happen. They would know this to be true.

Might have had to do a bit more with the military. Would have tried to stay closer to 1% than 99%. This feels like I am talking about the past now. Just like that.

Lets say the 100 year peace plan failed. Business contracts mostly. Who wouldn't want to try again? What's the harm really? I'm not talking huge complicated contracts where one side benefits the most. Gets more billions. Right off the bat. Maybe eventually, if economies got big enough on all sides. Probably never would have happened anyway. That big. With all that goes on.

I understand each side does things to the other. When they can. Maybe things like that would never work. Against political interests and such. It would have been much better for N.A.T.O. if they stopped just before Ukraine. Things would have been simpler to understand if Russia invaded. Then again Russia didn't do much as far as I know until the Ukraine issue. Never really looked into it. Don't believe half of what's said anyway. What is for sure, is that serious mistakes, have been made.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #52 · (Edited)
Will talk about traditional vs non-traditional M.A.D. warfare later. Or lots of strategic (cruise missiles) destruction, as fast as possible, by both sides, doing whatever they think they can get away with to each other. Without going nuclear. Hopefully. Whatever each side thinks, it can get away with.
------------------ Later ---------------------
When conventional warfare is M.A.D. warfare, using proxy war or direct conflict between two superpowers. Each side can get away, with doing lots, to the invaded country or area, especially in proxy warfare. As seen people do not want to belief it is possible to happen. Invasion or attack. Until it does. Then they were in denial and kind of act like they are in shock. Not able to deal with potential attack or invasion and then the consequences of that even. Make poor decision makers for sure then.

When one side has a big advantage. It's call shock and awe warfare. When each side, can do this to each other, it is M.A.D. warfare then. Taking out strategic targets, has long term consequences, that matter. That become, more and more, of a serious issue, as strategic resources get taken out and that have been taken out already. Your ability to fight back, becomes more and more degraded.

Whatever effectiveness you have, becomes less effective.

Taking out the enemies ability to attack you, as fast as possible is best. This increases the chance, you will suffer less damage. Assuming you do not force them to go nuclear on you. So in thinking like that. The more you can do right away, that has a bigger impact, as more and more time passes to. After you already attacked, and got away with it anyway with it.

So then, if you can destroy, even more of your enemies ability, to wage effective war again you, the better it is, to attack, and as hard as possible, right away (more enemy damage country wide).

In the opening salvos of war. The best defence, is a massive offence. So, less gets thrown back at you. So, lots of ordinance to throw, at the other side right away. Is the most effective strategy. As long as you can get away with it. So sticking to proxy warfare, is best for both sides, in conventional weapons usage, M.A.D. warfare. In nuclear or conventional M.A.D. warfare. This is best to. Not that I like it. In purely military terms.

Politicians, political parties (bunches of politicians) are supposed, to keep the dogs of war leashed. That means in provoking wars to. Not just at the 99th hour to. Stepping in and pretending to be heroes.

So if throwing as much as you can at the enemy right away is best. That may mean, and does, to a degree for sure. That having more guns and big guns to shoot back with is better than less guns ultimately. (The Russian Hoard). If you have enough tanks lets say to fight 5 enemy tank units. But they have eight enemy tank units or whatever. That means the enemy is free to use those three spare enemy tank units, to attack your country, at it's pleasure. Also to occupy land at it's pleasure. In real simple terms anyway. Everything else being equal. There is cruise missiles, and mortars and planes and ships and subs and all that but still. Your enemy can attack from more places, than you can defend from effectively. I assume anyway, and really don't want to find out for sure about. That means, a weaker side, with less forces, even if in, one to one battles, win. They still loose, on the strategic level. So big and scary weapon systems, like nuclear munitions, may get used then. Or cruise missiles, or whatever. Those conventional weapons, first I would guess, get used up. Then whatever s left over, gets used. Unless peace is declared.

So if each side does not want to use nuclear weapons. And all sides may attack each other in mass. that means massive damage can be done to each side. So I expect each side to want to stay away from each other. Basically to try to keep that from happening. In that way both sides have lots to loose. And may be willing to do it. Each side giving each other a beating. May be able to see war damage, right outside your door.

I sure hope, if one cruise missile from Russia, goes into NATO airspace, and destroys something. Some crazy person reprogrammed it, or something. That nuclear weapons don't get thrown at each other, right away.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #53 · (Edited)
Well to me since a toe-popper land mine, was not used, like I thought it might have been used, to take out the tire of the car. Well to me, that is a indicator, that the Russians plan on staying maybe, or maybe, just not wanting to kill people indiscriminately. Because, they do not want to have to worry about stepping on land mines themselves. In the short term, to me, it also indicated more troops are going to be moving through. Or getting stationed there, or staged in various places temporarily or all. Basically don't want to worry about land mines. Sky News team's harrowing account of their violent ambush in Ukraine this week

Well the invader not using land mines indiscriminately.

This is just a one off, but still. All sides have updated tactics and strategies over time.

When it comes to it and they can. They hit you where you are weak. Next generation warfare. Always. The military and your government always wants to make it about guns and violence and hence justification for all they do (the police state, more of that). Always. Always. Always. Then you get more abuse of peoples rights and freedoms and liberties. Then the government, wants those angry people to be violence. To justify, a even bigger and badder police state, that does even more. Until you are lucky, if you end up in something like Russia, and not some even more evil religious based police state. That makes what it does, religion based police state of brutal commonplace violent. Even if it's just indifference to your suffering because suffering, in itself, has become commonplace.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #54 · (Edited)
There is something called proxy warfare. In proxy warfare, one superpower or another, has invaded somewhere. The other superpower supports, the invaded ally. Usually with man portable weapon systems. Like AKs and RPGs, and sometimes so many, you can actually buy them, in places like Africa and such (AKs and RPGs). Or stinger missiles and such. Each side does this, always, to each other, in the current conflict(s) they are involved in, around the world. This is normal. S.O.P. Not that I like it. Each side has no choice, but to support it's allies. Somewhat at least. N.A.T.O. usually withdraws eventually or only protects oil or other strategic resources. Land itself can be consider a strategic resource. To close for comfort, like with the Cuban missile crisis.

So I expected, this to happen in the current Ukraine vs Russia conflict. It has to, happened. A stinger missile shooting down a chopper.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #55 ·
Well I was right into reading about peak oil. Years and years ago there. One of the things that was talked about in regards to oil shortages is that a little shortage can go a long ways to increases oil prices. A 1% oil shortage in North America can lead to big price spikes and or big price increases. Depending upon how long a oil shortage lasts. At a certain point people earning minimum wage, can literally, not afford to work, it was said. Based upon some basic math formula. It ripples through everything. More expensive to harvest corn. More expensive to transport corn. More expensive to make replacement tires for trucks. More expensive to move corn from warehouses. More expensive to drive to stores to buy goods. Etc.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #56 · (Edited)
It sure is nice for various countries, that get to blame Russia, for future price increases, that were already happening. Russia might have gotten pulled into a (Bear Trap) that way. (Predictable Russian response). If you look at what was done, as to what was said. They are already getting the blame for that.

Tying politicians hands somewhat, makes things harder for them, and safer for us, all. (Not me though). They care not for us, at all. Never did, never will. But pretend to. They are supposed to get unelected and such and maybe parties loose most of there seats. So what. This type of thing is not supposed to happen. The problem is this may be true.

So if Russia was to leave Ukraine, we would find out. Except for of course, more military spending, already under way now. Or we would find out, if a peace treaty was enacted, once the Russians stop advancing, wherever in Ukraine, and then made a peace treaty. Well you will here the danger of the Russian bear then and need for massive military spending. I can not even argue that either. To scary not to. Regardless, I would have no faith, for my personal security, with N.A.T.O. now, if I lived in Europe.

In that light. It might have been best if Trump won, and the USA withdrew from N.A.T.O. As been said now, he planned on doing. (A possible tell (indicator) with what the USA, will do in the future, in regards to N.A.T.O. in Europe. Leaving and salting the earth). In the future, whenever a world leader, talks like that. It should be taken very seriously, by all involved. A person with a high level overviews, of whats going on, and possible, future plans to be enacted. Should be taken, as a warning, to become, more self reliant, in country style self defensive measures. A possible tell, as to how stupid, the average high level person is, in the military, and political leadership. No one wants to believe, but it's there job to worry and plan. This is scary stuff. Warfare where you live. No one wants to believe it's possible.

Because of that. (It's Russia's fault for your $$$$ problems), I expect. Only full withdraw, of all Russian forces, will be consider (acceptable) to N.A.T.O. leadership in N.A. That will not happen, unless Russia does it on it's own. So things may get even worst. (More $$$$ problems for you). Some politicians, may want things to get worst. All they have to worry about is getting unelected or getting elected. That is all they literally worry about.

T.N.O. Trust no one. God works in mysterious ways sometimes. I know about game theory somewhat to. AKA 1984 on our side. I would have fell for the book store antique trap. Baubles and bits and nits.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #57 · (Edited)
Well this might be a escalation point in the current Russia Ukraine war. Involving Poland. Sending fighters to Poland, so there current Russian made fighters, can be sent to Ukraine. Poland is a member of N.A.T.O. So Putin can take this as a escalation from a N.A.T.O. member, and hence, as a escalation by N.A.T.O. Well will definitely be interesting, to see what happens. Scary if I lived in Europe. Lets hope history books, don't consider this a turning point.
Story here. https://ca.news.yahoo.com/war-ukraine-likely-intensify-week-154612106.html

With this high level former I think the military person talking. He is implying, that Ukraine will have to surrender, in the future, at some point maybe. Implying to me, that what is being done, is not enough maybe, to save Ukraine from a Russian take over.

Whatever parts the Russians want, and take, and (take back). That could be considered a indicator that Russia, wanted a excuse (plan), all along, years ago, to invade Ukraine. The lands they gave to Ukraine. Russia might have felt threaten because of N.A.T.O. expansionism and did this preemptively. Just in case N.A.T.O. wooed Ukraine.

List of N.A.T.O. Member countries.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #58 · (Edited)
US to ban Russian oil imports over Ukraine invasion.

At a high level. This means there is more oil for Europe to buy from Russia. Making a oil guzzling Europe more important to Russia's economy. Also Europe having more oil to buy from there own continent. Closer ties.

This is also a possible indicator that the U.S.A. If it can become energy independent, or more energy independent, no longer wants to buy energy, from Europe and or Russia or believes, it will not be able to. The U.S.A. might then, need higher energy costs, to rapidly expand, it's own energy production. May see things like, more hydro dams and such. Even smaller dams and such. Not just huge gigantic ones. Water can be turned into hydrogen, and stored ultimately. Rocket fuel, but still. More fuel efficient vehicles, etc. There are some solutions to liquid fuel usage.

I am sure cruise missiles, might be able to use hydrogen, as fuel anyway.

Oil gets fought over normally. Maybe (peak oil) is here ($$$$)? I don't know. Lots of people have peak oil burn out. Maybe. Not so easy, to ramp up production cheaply, is here. Should create some more jobs, in your local counties anyway. I wonder if $1000 US dollar bills might come back. Or in other countries to.

This means if you buy resources like oil in USA dollars. You need more USA dollars. Maybe get and use them while you can. Fast turn around usage. Will make commodities pricing, even higher then. Don't really know. It was said real world goods held there value mostly, during inflation periods. Gold? Food, fuel, boots, lip stick. Etc. Go Christmas shopping, birthday shopping early. Some anyway if you can. Who do you care about for that, if it comes down to it. Some presents anyway, board games, toys. Cards for all others, or special email greetings, a call. Just some. Can always do more shopping later.

Hydrogen got talked about lots for awhile on the news even. The hydrogen economy. As it got talked about, it was about storing hydrogen as a fuel source. I think they may plan to create hydrogen in energy rich places like where hydro dams are. Then using catalyst, and other chemistry reactions. Turn hydrogen into liquid natural gas, and liquid propane, as such. Or the holy grail. Turn hydrogen into something that is a liquid fuel, at room temperature basically. This is a area where the America people can shine. Unleash the might of the America people, into solving this problem. Assuming someone, or some company, doesn't already know how to do this.

In Canada, we have been having some attacks on pipelines. Having electric power lines attacked, is not the same, as having a liquid fuel, or gaseous fuel pipeline attacked. We already ship electricity around a country anyway. So we could ship electricity to various places in a country and hopefully have water turned into hydrogen fuel that gets converted into a room temperature liquid fuel or natural gas or whatever. Then have those fuel producing hubs (merely send electricity there), dispersed around a country, distributing hydrocarbon based energy, around the country, for public transportation purposes, and other purposes.

A bit more of a breather, as electric vehicles, get mass produced, more and more. Where it works good at first. Flat places, and all that. Maybe. Another thing with the press. Telling you, what the problem is, and the solution it. Rocket fuel for your person vehicle. People don't like that so much. Turning your personal vehicle into the space shuttle. Talking heads whom mean well.

So water is hydrogen and oxygen. Carbon dixiode is carbon and hydrogen. So with those to chemicals, you might be able to make hydrocarbons in industrial levels. Carbon, hydrogen and oxygen. With industrial power production. Like with dams and coal fired plants. If you make 100 mega watta of power continiously but only use 80 mega watts continiously. You immedicately loose those 20 mega watts you never used. Each and ever second basically. A large fraction of those 20 mega watts could be used to produce a liquid hydrocarbon hopefully. Eventually places like coal fired plants might be able to sell CO2 to these places after infrastructure gets made. It has been said that about 30% of electricity is lost transporting the electricity to cities and such. Not so with pipes moving fuel to various places. You get 100% of that fuel to use after the pipes and such are filled up. If you need 100 million liters of fuel to fill all the pipes well that what you need before you get any out the burn in cars and such. When the fuel is burned in power plants andyway. The CO2 produced, can be sold back, to fuel productiion facilitiis. Even a gas based hydrocarbon, to burn at electrical generator sites, is useful. Ship the fuel to sites closer to cities and such.
---------------------------------
I have never owned a vehicle myself. But this is how I understand how some hybrids work anyway. It should work this way. Which would fix up some problems anyway. If it works this way you personally can always get back to driving your vehicle fast. Recharge fast, A.K.A. driving again fast. Using gasoline, to refuel fast, and charge your batteries at work, and at home (for hours). Switching to electric motor operation, whenever possible.

A electric generator, is a electric motor when you apply electricity to it.

So as I had it explained to me by hybrid car owner, when I asked him. He said, he has a regular gas or diesel engine, that can run off a gas tank. Refuel at a regular gas station basically. That recharges his batteries when he's driving, and that can also plug in to electrical outlet, if I remember correctly. I remember being quit impressed. It had a electric motor in it, when he ran off batteries. Well after that explanation. That is how, I see hybrid vehicles, as they should be. Fixes a lot of problems. Hybrids. In your daily personal life. Using your vehicle day to day as usual. Basically.

The electric motor/generator combo, is a real heavy duty replacement for your car alternator, in some ways. Way more power and such. But basically a replacement or could be thought of that way. Not accurate basically but similar to one. Higher voltage levels and such I guess or not. Alternators do charge your normal, lead acid car battery, and such.

Prepper sites (people online there) before, during worries of peak oil. Talked about having a special carburettor installed in your vehicle. That lets you adjust your fuel air ratio I guess, so you can use different fuel source input. Even propane to run your vehicle. What happens is you loose power, horse power. So in that case, if you are someone whom uses a truck, with loads to deliver, or whatever. You need spare horse power. Like 50% spare horse power, to compensate, for lost horse power, when you use a different fuel source. Don't actually know, if it's true or not, but up to like a 30% horse power loss.

A electronic carburettor should be able, to do this on the fly basically. Adjust for needed fuel-to air-ratio, per a different fuel type input. Each fuel type needs a different fuel-to-air ratio I guess. Or you have some selector switch to turn. Then it automatically adjusts for the fuel source type you are using. More or less air (oxygen) being put into pistons. With air temp and your altitude being also taken into consideration, with computers, it's just a code update basically. Already have oxygen sensors in your vehicle. Maybe a simple switch or two. Current temp and altitude. Set once or seasonally if needed, by you. Or if you travel.

A wrong setting can blow a piston(s). Too hot. (temp sensor warning and auto slow down). Burns through piston head. Thin and moving at a high velocity. Up and then down and not around. Might be able to make engines where pistons spin around instead of move up and down. Like a fly wheel. If it's safe. Inside the engine itself. Like a propeller in some ways. Stubby propellers. With a ring or and or engine surrounded the spinning pistons. Or a shaft spinning itself around the center of a ring of pistons. Who knows. Like a engine shaft. Perfectly straight shaft. Not a cam shaft. A part of it made somewhat weaker, on purpose, to break at high speeds, where where it is most armoured basically, to protect you. You are around spinning shafts all the time already basically.

Basically like propeller based airplane engines.
 

· Super Moderator
Joined
·
977 Posts
Discussion Starter · #60 · (Edited)
Russia, Blocked From the Global Internet, Plunges Into Digital Isolation. https://ca.news.yahoo.com/russia-blocked-global-internet-plunges-194040664.html
This is probably about protection, from cyber warfare, which high level government officials in the USA in the past, have said is a real form of warfare. Spinning up cyber warfare defence measures. Mostly isolation. Other things to. We will see how that works out. Satellites and other wireless means, and all that. No big secret to them. Probably not just cyber warfare in itself, but in combination, with other stuff too. Nations can do that.

Different branches and areas of the military working together. Joint operations. Joint task forces.
 
41 - 60 of 179 Posts
Top